
Last verified: May 2026 (England & Wales)
If your brother or sister is questioning your parent’s Will, the first question is usually simple:
Can they actually do anything about it, or are they just unhappy with the outcome?
The answer depends on the facts. A sibling cannot usually overturn a Will just because they expected more, feel hurt, or believe the estate should have been divided equally. But if there are concerns about capacity, pressure, fraud, signing, suspicious circumstances, or reasonable financial provision, the dispute may need proper legal review.
If you are at the early stage and need a quick first view, start with the Free Claim Checker.
Fern Wills & LPAs has partnered with inheritance dispute specialists IDR Law. Their Claim Checker helps you explain what has happened and receive an early report on the possible strengths and weaknesses of the issue.
A Will dispute is not always really about the Will. Sometimes it is about grief, fairness, old family history, money worries, or a mixture of all four. The legal route depends on the evidence, not just the strength of feeling.
Sibling disputes often start when one child receives more than another, one child is left out, or one person was more involved with the parent before death.
That can feel unfair. It can also raise genuine questions.
For example:
There is no automatic rule that parents must divide everything equally between children. Unequal does not always mean invalid. But some patterns do justify closer review.
If your wider question is whether a Will can be challenged at all, see our broader guide: Can You Contest a Will?
A sibling may try to challenge a Will for several reasons.
A person making a Will must understand broadly what they are doing, what they own, who they might be expected to consider, and the effect of the decisions they are making.
Capacity concerns often arise where a parent had dementia, serious illness, confusion, medication issues, or vulnerability at the time the Will was made.
That does not automatically mean the Will is invalid. Many people with a diagnosis can still make a valid Will. The question is whether they had the required capacity at the relevant time.
A sibling may say the parent was pressured into changing the Will.
This can be difficult to prove. Influence is not the same as normal family closeness. A child helping a parent with appointments, shopping or paperwork is not automatically doing anything wrong.
The issue is whether the parent’s free wishes were overborne.
Sometimes the concern is more direct. For example, someone may believe a signature was forged, a document was altered, or the parent did not know what they were signing.
These are serious allegations. They need evidence, not speculation.
A Will must be signed and witnessed correctly. If the formalities were not followed, the Will may be vulnerable.
This is one reason professionally supervised signing matters. Small signing errors can create large problems after death.
Not every claim is about whether the Will is valid.
Sometimes the Will may be valid, but someone may still argue that the estate has failed to make reasonable financial provision for them.
That is a different type of claim. It often depends on eligibility, financial need, dependency and the wider family circumstances.
If the issue is about deliberately leaving someone out when making a Will, see our guide to deliberately excluding someone from your Will.
The first sign may be a difficult conversation, a solicitor’s letter, or a warning that someone intends to “stop probate”.
Sometimes a sibling will enter a caveat.
A caveat can stop a grant of probate being issued while the dispute is looked at. In practical terms, this can slow down the estate because the executors may not be able to get the authority they need to administer it.
A caveat is not the same as winning the dispute. It is a blocking step. If it is used without proper grounds, it can create cost risk.
A caveat should not be treated as a bargaining tool. It is a serious step connected to probate and legal costs can follow if it is used badly.
If the grant of probate has already been issued, the situation is different.
At that point, the estate may already be moving. Assets may be collected, property may be sold, and distributions may be planned or partly made.
That does not mean every possible claim disappears, but delay can make the position more difficult. The right response depends on the type of dispute, how far the estate has progressed, and what evidence exists.
This is why early screening matters. Waiting until the estate has moved on can make a difficult situation harder.
A formal Letter of Claim usually sets out why your sibling says the Will should not stand, or why they say they have a claim against the estate.
It may refer to:
Do not ignore it.
A rushed emotional reply can make things worse. A careful response should deal with the real legal issues and the available evidence.
The Free Claim Checker is a useful first step if you are not sure whether the dispute has substance or what route it falls into.
Yes, a beneficiary whose inheritance is directly affected may have an interest in defending the Will.
Executors need to act carefully. Their job is not simply to take sides in a family argument. Depending on the situation, they may need to remain neutral, protect the estate, provide information, or follow specialist advice.
A beneficiary is different. If your inheritance would be reduced or lost if the challenge succeeds, you may have your own interest in the outcome.
That does not mean you should deal with it aggressively. In family disputes, tone matters. The aim is to protect the position without making the dispute more expensive or damaging than it needs to be.
Not usually.
Many disputes are resolved before a final court hearing. That may happen through correspondence, disclosure of key documents, negotiation, or mediation.
Mediation can be particularly useful in sibling disputes because it allows both sides to explore settlement without needing to be in the same room. It can reduce cost, delay and pressure, especially where the estate needs to be administered and the family relationship is already damaged.
Court may still be needed in some cases. For example, where the evidence is strong, the sums are large, or one side will not engage sensibly.
But court should not be treated as the only route.
It usually can be, but it depends on the facts.
Court proceedings in contested Will and probate matters can become expensive. Costs can also become disproportionate if the estate is modest or the dispute is driven more by emotion than evidence.
Mediation does not guarantee agreement. But it can give everyone a controlled opportunity to understand the risks, test the evidence, and see whether a practical settlement is possible.
In many family disputes, an early settlement is not just cheaper. It can also allow people to move on.
There is no single answer.
A dispute that settles early may be resolved in months. A dispute involving court proceedings, complex evidence, property, medical records, or entrenched family conflict can take much longer.
The main things that affect timescale are:
The earlier you understand the route, the easier it is to avoid drifting.
Sibling Will disputes are rarely just technical.
They often arrive at the worst possible time, when people are grieving and dealing with practical arrangements after death.
A dispute can reopen old family wounds. It can affect relationships with nieces, nephews, stepfamilies and surviving parents. It can also make it harder for executors to do their job calmly.
That is not a reason to give in to a weak claim. It is a reason to get a clear early view, then decide your next step with your eyes open.
The unequal shares after years of care
One child had cared for the parent for several years. The Will left that child a larger share. The other sibling saw this as favouritism and threatened to challenge. The practical issue was whether the parent understood the decision and whether there was evidence explaining why the unequal split had been made. The dispute needed careful handling because unfairness and invalidity are not the same thing.
The late change to the Will
A parent changed their Will shortly before death. One sibling benefited significantly more than before. The other sibling was concerned about illness, medication and pressure. In that situation, the key questions would usually include capacity, the circumstances of the meeting, who arranged it, and whether the professional file supported the decision.
The sibling who controlled access
One child handled appointments, visits and paperwork. After death, another sibling said they had been shut out and that the Will could not be trusted. Control and influence can be relevant, but they do not prove undue influence by themselves. The evidence would need to show whether the parent was acting freely and understood what they were doing.
The valid Will, but a possible financial need
A parent left most of the estate to one child. Another child had serious financial need and had been dependent on the parent. The Will might still be valid, but the issue may be a possible claim for reasonable financial provision rather than a validity challenge. That distinction matters because the legal route is different.
The executor caught in the middle
Two siblings were beneficiaries, and one was also executor. A dispute then arose about whether the Will was valid. The executor had to be careful not to treat the estate as their personal battleground. The beneficiary interest and executor duties needed to be separated so the estate could be handled properly.

No, not just because they were disappointed. They would normally need a legal basis, such as a concern about validity or a possible claim for reasonable financial provision.
No. There is no simple rule that every child must receive an equal share. But a very unequal Will can sometimes lead to questions, especially if there are concerns about capacity, pressure, dependency, or a sudden change.
A caveat can stop a grant of probate being issued for a period while the dispute is considered. It does not prove the Will is invalid. It is a serious procedural step and should not be used lightly.
Do not ignore it and do not fire back an emotional response. Work out what legal ground is being raised, what evidence exists, and whether specialist advice is needed. The Free Claim Checker is a sensible first screening step.
Yes, if your inheritance is directly affected, you may have an interest in defending the Will. Executors, however, need to act carefully and may need specialist guidance on their role.
No. Some cases need firm legal steps. But mediation can be useful where both sides are willing to engage and there is a realistic chance of settlement.
Fern Wills & LPAs does not run contested probate or inheritance dispute cases in-house.
Where appropriate, we introduce inheritance dispute matters to IDR Law, a specialist firm dealing exclusively with contentious Wills, probate and trusts work.
If you go on to instruct IDR Law, Fern Wills & LPAs may receive a fee share. This means we receive 10% of any fees received by IDR Law during your case. Your fees will not be any greater than if there were no such arrangement in place.
IDR Law is independent of Fern Wills & LPAs and will act in your best interests. Our arrangement with IDR Law does not affect the advice they give you, which will be impartial and confidential.
Information you provide to IDR Law will not be disclosed to Fern Wills & LPAs unless you consent.
If a sibling is contesting a parent’s Will, you do not need to work out the whole legal position before asking for help.
Start by finding out whether there may be a real claim, what type of claim it might be, and whether it is worth taking further.
Use the Free Claim Checker to get an early view.
This article is general information only, not individual advice.